TheHarry BinswangerLetter

  • This topic has 2 voices and 2 replies.
Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #98872 test
      | DIR.

      Earlier this year Professor Locke recommended Arthur Herman’s The Cave and the Light: Plato versus Aristotle, and the Struggle for Western Civilization. I recently finished it and found the book to very good. In particular the author’s conviction that ideas matter makes the book very illuminating as he keys on major ideas that have had lasting impact. For example, Herman gives a thoroughly fascinating description of the Platonism and Neoplatonism in Christianity as well as a clear understanding of the totalitarian consequences of Hegel.Ā 

      In Professor’s Locke’s post he states as a negative that there is no mention of Kant. I am not sure why he wrote that because Herman addresses Kant numerous times in the book.Ā 

      Some key quotes:

      ā€œOver Kant’s reading of Rousseau flutters the flag of the United Nations, but also the first pages of Georg Friedrich Hegel’s Philosophy of Right and Auguste Comte’s Positive Philosophy, not to mention Marx’s Das Kapital. With the fusion of Kant and Rousseau, the European mind was on the brink of a new way of visualizing the direction and purpose of civil society: toward the abolition of the self-interested individual, instead of his ultimate triumph.ā€

      Herman does give a very favorable treatment to the pragmatism of C.S. Peirce and William James, however thatĀ does not detract too much from the overall value of the book which, I took, as an exploration of the themes discussed in the epilogue of Dr. Peikoff’s OPAR.

      Ayn Rand is mentioned favorably several times in the book.

    • #108854 test
      | DIR.
      Cecil Williams

      Thanks for recommending this ‘..cave’ book. Ā The experience of reading it allowed me toĀ visualize the the individuals’ Ā and their ideas discussed Ā as real people in a real world. Ā By way of contrast, Ā the mere naming of and dating and highlighting Ā the works of individual historical figures causes the reader to miss so much, I think. Ā I consider, for example, as a youngster, Thomas Jeffereson was named and dated followed by a one paragraph or so of a couple of quotes followed by what someone thought ofĀ him. Ā  And, that was very boring…. Ā Consequently, I was an adult before I learned just what a crucial character he was. Ā Ā 

      Similarly, Herman’s presentation of Aquinas made the pivotal character comeĀ alive. Ā And, teachers might pick up on his method as a way to teach ObjectivismĀ to thinking adults. Ā 

    • #109695 test
      | DIR.

      Thanks, I’m going to buy it. Is it better than Aristotle’s Children by Richard Rubenstein? I really enjoyed listening to that book.

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.