- This topic has 3 voices and 3 replies.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
I enjoyed this movie and it may have interest for others.Ā The story isĀ not complex (see any of the trailers andĀ you’ve got it) or particularly new.Ā What I liked is the way the lead character is portrayed and the insights the film offers into the issue of aging.
Robert Di Nero plays aĀ 70 something who gets hired as an intern for a hip, new internet company focused on women’s wear. He has retired from a life long career in business and recently his wife of 40 years has died. Film opens with him trying to find things to interest him and he come across an advertisement for a intern.
One of the things I noticed was how all the usual jokes of “oldsters” are reserved for minor characters – woman who no longer can focus on driving, another who can’t grasp anything about computers. Di Nero, by contrast is refreshingly comfortableĀ in his own skin and has a disarming honesty of recognizing what heĀ doesn’t know and willingness to learn (e.g., he starts with a clam shell phone and ends with an iPhone without any angst). He also knows his value and the importance of what he’s learned in business.
He is assigned to the founder, a very bright, very scattered Anne Hathaway who initially resists the assignment.Ā How their relationship deepens drives the movie forward. Watch for the reason she gives for her early resistance – it isĀ also quite honest and helps to open their eventual relationship. His encouragement to the HathawayĀ character also left meĀ cheering.
-
Harry,
He is assigned to the founder, a very bright, very scattered Anne Hathaway who initially resists the assignment.
But isn’t the founder the primary decision-maker, so she would makeĀ or manage assignments? I.e., who could give assignments to a founder, a board of directors?
Is experience, perhaps conservatism, the theme? Is it pro-business or is there a cynical context with a “scattered” founder?
Could De Niro play Rearden?!
Seems good, though.
-
While the plot is pretty obvious, I didn’t want to give too much away. Just why he’s her intern and how itĀ happens I’ll have to leave to your viewing.
I didn’t think of it at the time, but the absence of cynicism is one of the great virtues of the film. The “can do” optimism of a brash internet startup infuses the film. It is what makes Di Niro so attractive in my view. He’s arguably nearing the end of his life but you wouldn’t know it from hisĀ actions or spirit.
As to Rearden, who knows.Ā Perhaps when he was younger.Ā But this film is nowhere near Atlas in its scope.Ā It isn’t even as explicitly “pro-business” as “Other People’s Money”. Rather it looks at abilities from the perspective ofĀ age and projects a life affirming outlook. It also looks at the importance knowing your personalĀ worth and holding true to your values.
A small vignette as a teaser: Di Niro isĀ being interviewed by individuals 40-50 years his junior. We begin to understand he has extensive experience in marketing and production and has probably conducted hundreds of such interviews as an employer. And yet with just a touch of wry humor at the corners of his mouth and a humorous twinkleĀ in his eyes he treats the questions seriously and answers them honestly.
Then this exchange occurs (from memory…)
Twenty something {with a serious, man-of-the worldĀ look}: “this is probablyĀ our most important question so give it serious thought… ‘where do you want to be in 10 years?'”
Di Nero: “Alive”
Twenty something {clearly flustered and speaking very rapidly}: “Oh, gosh, I didn’t realize your age is 70. Oh, um, well, um, IĀ guess we should just put that question aside shall we…”
Di Nero: “yes, let’s”.
-
Re: Harry Mullin’s post 108863 of 10/05/15 at 7:31pm
I liked this movie a lot, for its positive — dare I say egoistic — view of business and CEOs. The plot, direction and cinematography reflect a sunny view of life’s possibilities. Thanks to Harry M. for the recommendation.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.