TheHarry BinswangerLetter

  • This topic has 2 voices and 2 replies.
Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #98923 test
      | DIR.

      This is a good article by Patrick Moore explaining in a speech to the Global Warming Policy Foundation why he left Greenpeace and why he is skeptical of AGW.

      http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/10/15/greenpeace-founder-lets-celebrate-co2/

      The contention that human emissions are now the dominant influence on climate is simply a hypothesis, rather than a universally accepted scientific theory. It is therefore correct, indeed verging on compulsory in the scientific tradition, to be skeptical of those who express certainty that “the science is settled” and “the debate is over”.

      But there is certainty beyond any doubt that CO2 is the building block for all life on Earth and that without its presence in the global atmosphere at a sufficient concentration this would be a dead planet. Yet today our children and our publics are taught that CO2 is a toxic pollutant that will destroy life and bring civilization to its knees. Tonight I hope to turn this dangerous human-caused propaganda on its head. Tonight I will demonstrate that human emissions of CO2 have already saved life on our planet from a very untimely end. That in the absence of our emitting some of the carbon back into the atmosphere from whence it came in the first place, most or perhaps all life on Earth would begin to die less than two million years from today. . . .

      NASA tells us that “Carbon Dioxide Controls Earth’s Temperature” in child-like denial of the many other factors involved in climate change. . . . leaders of the G7 plan to “end extreme poverty and hunger” by phasing out 85% of the world’s energy supply including 98% of the energy used to transport people and goods, including food.

      The world’s top climate body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change, is hopelessly conflicted by its makeup and it mandate. . . . They are virtually mandated to find on the side of apocalypse. . . .

      the Pope, spiritual leader of the Catholic Church, in a bold move to reinforce the concept of original sin, says the Earth looks like “an immense pile of filth” and we must go back to pre-industrial bliss, or is that squalor?

      In the mid 1980s I found myself the only director of Greenpeace International with a formal education in science. My fellow directors proposed a campaign to “ban chlorine worldwide”, naming it “The Devil’s Element”. I pointed out that chlorine is one of the elements in the Periodic Table, one of the building blocks of the Universe and the 11th most common element in the Earth’s crust. I argued the fact that chlorine is the most important element for public health and medicine. Adding chlorine to drinking water was the biggest advance in the history of public health and the majority of our synthetic medicines are based on chlorine chemistry. This fell on deaf ears, and for me this was the final straw. I had to leave.

    • #109015 test
      | DIR.

      Sam — thanks for posting this. I found this astonishing. He’s not just skeptical, he turns the entire argument on its head while taking a moral stand. He’s not saying the math is off, or “yeah it’s warming but we can’t be sure what the consequences will be” — he’s saying bring on the CO2. Man is actually saving the world by releasing CO2 back into the atmosphere.

      “Human emissions of carbon dioxide have saved life on Earth from inevitable starvation and extinction due to lack of CO2.”

      Admittedly I don’t follow the global warming debates closely, but this is the first time I’ve ever heard this argument coming from a scientist with impeccable leftist credentials. His position seems like a game changer to me. Greenpeace has a statement on their website, and all they can do is smear him for his corporate connections. They offer no rebuttal of his actual argument. Really hope he writes a book–and gets exposure outside of conservative media. 

      Money quote:

      “I fear for the end of the Enlightenment. I fear an intellectual Gulag with Greenpeace as my prison guards.”

    • #109021 test
      | DIR.

      I agree Thomas. I posted liking what I read in only the first half showing the enviros’ hypocrisy, power-lust, sloppy conclusions and assertions. Though Moore didn’t mention how the Left is using the IPCC and climate change to redistribute the wealth of the producers by penalizing them for increasing the living standards of all.

      The second half is a very plausible theory completely contradicting the “settled science.” One I had not heard before.

      On their heads indeed. “Man is not the enemy of nature but its salvation.”

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.